rfc1: Assisted-by example should use periods

[garlick]

Problem: the Assisted-by example uses opus-4-8 but it's probably more natural to use periods.

Change the example.

[mergify]

Tick the box to add this pull request to the merge queue (same as @mergifyio queue).

• Queue this pull request

[github-actions]

⚠️ linkcheck failed with status code 2

[chu11]

LGTM!

[grondo]

One point that might need clarification: can MODEL_VERSION contain whitespace?

[chu11]

One point that might need clarification: can MODEL_VERSION contain whitespace?

On that note, do we want to be specific about format or perhaps keep it semi broadly open?

In flux-framework/flux-core#7715 @grondo thought it should be Claude:claude-opus-4.8, but when I asked Claude to put in a trailer, it chose Claude:Opus 4.8. Version can be somewhat ambiguous or broad.

[wihobbs]

One thing I just noticed is the LKML "standard" isn't cited anywhere on the page even though that's what we're using. Perhaps it should go in "further reading"?

Saying "follow the LKML guidelines" is, IMHO, as unambiguous as you can get for this.

[garlick]

I'm not sure we need to cite the kernel here, or get too prescriptive. The kernel's guidelines are also pretty open ended about things like periods and spaces.

[grondo]

Ok, sounds like "Claude: Opus 4.8" is just fine. The example implies an attempt to avoid whitespace (e.g. to perhaps allow later parsing when there are multiple items in the Assisted-by: line), but sounds like that isn't necessary. That was my only point of confusion.

[garlick]

works for me. Hopefully I'm not being shortsighted about parsing, but unless were to specify a full on schema like SPDX, it seems like it doesn't matter much.