fix(scan): prune IN predicates using file stats#382
Draft
hhhizzz wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
hhhizzz
changed the title
2 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Uses file min/max stats to prune
INpredicates when every literal is outside the file value range.NOT IN, missing stats, corrupt stats, and unsupported comparisons continue to fail open.Why
Before this change, non-partition
INpredicates always skipped stats pruning and could keep files that min/max metadata can prove cannot match.Validation
cargo test -p paimon test_data_file_matches_in --lib -- --nocapturegit diff --check