Hi, it would be amazing to gain support for Databricks through the adbc_scanner extension. I tried this today via ATTACH, and encountered a couple of issues:
- The quoting around
"catalog"."schema"."table" causes some issues. I think databricks doesn't use quoting the same way duckdb does, and needs to have a different character substituted in place of quotes.
- Databricks ADBC driver does not support
get table schema yet (see here, leading to lookup behavior during catalog/schema/table querying to fail.
I was wondering, to that second point, is the lack of get table schema a dealbreaker for ATTACH-style usage of this extension?
Hi, it would be amazing to gain support for Databricks through the adbc_scanner extension. I tried this today via
ATTACH, and encountered a couple of issues:"catalog"."schema"."table"causes some issues. I think databricks doesn't use quoting the same way duckdb does, and needs to have a different character substituted in place of quotes.get table schemayet (see here, leading to lookup behavior during catalog/schema/table querying to fail.I was wondering, to that second point, is the lack of get table schema a dealbreaker for ATTACH-style usage of this extension?